So I recently started reading some of Marcus Aurelius's Meditations, written between 170 and 180 CEby...Marcus Aurelius. More on those later, first, some history:
If anyone has watched "Gladiator" with Russell Crowe, they know a couple of things. First, Commodus was a conniving evil bastard who kills his father (the great Marcus Aurelius) and becomes emperor, then along comes a Gladiator, who kills Commodus and returns Rome to a republic. This is not true. This is what I would call "Operation Iraqi Freedom in Rome" Staring Russell Crowe as the savior and that thing on Russell Crowe's forehead as the adorable sidekick. The two of them travel through an ancient dictator ship, seduce a pretty lady with curly hair and then deliver democracy to the struggling nation.
Here is a slightly more reasonable story. Marcus Aurelius was a good emperor (in fact he is considered the final of the "five good emperors" of Rome.) However he was a little more virile than the preceding emperors, and had some sons, including his heir, Commodus. When Commodus was 14, he became a man, and when he was 16, Marcus Aurelius raised him to "imperator" and ruled side by side until Marcus died. Then Commodus became Emperor. After Commodus came Pertinax, then Didius Julianus, then Septimius Severus, and so on and so forth...no Republic in sight, and no Spanish Gladiator to dethrone him.
So, back to the Meditations. Marcus Aurelius was considered a philosopher-emperor and wrote extensively relating to his philisophy: Stoicism. Every once in a while I find a meditation I find sort of confusing and a little interesting. Like the one today from book 10:
A spider is proud when it has caught a fly, and another when he has caught a poor hare, and another when he has taken a little fish in a net, and another when he has taken wild boars, and another when he has taken bears, and another when he has taken Sarmatians. Are not these robbers, if thou examinest their opinions?
Pretty large jump to go from catching a fly, a hare, a bear, and then bam! The Sarmatians. The ancient race that inhabited the land that is now Iran. Wow, quite a jump
Stoicism does not promote personal glory. It remarks how proud animals/people may be when they capture something, but in the end, they are just robbers. Intersting idea, but still, I would argue that the instinct that drives a spider to capture the fly is vastly different than the human instinct to conquer a neighboring territory, even if the end result is just one party "robbing" the life of the other.
It's hard to compare HUMAN instinct to ANIMAL instinct. Like comparing apples to a coffe mug.
ReplyDeleteAnd I do not feel empowered/proud by 'capturing' things. Especially bugs and boars. Kitty-terds even more so =) This 'capture = pride' must be an ego thing.